Effects of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Udenafil.

Udenafil is a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor used to treat erectile dysfunction. Although udenafil is not predominantly eliminated by the kidney, renal impairment can alter its secretion/transport pathways. Drug pharmacokinetics and safety must therefore be assessed in subjects with a renal impairment. We investigated the effects of impaired renal function on the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single 100-mg oral dose of udenafil in a single-dose, open-label, parallel-group study of 31 subjects. Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance was used to stratify these subjects into healthy controls (>80 mL·min-1 ) and individuals with mild (50 to ≤80 mL·min-1 ), moderate (30 to ≤50 mL·min-1 ), and severe (<30 mL·min-1 ) renal impairment. Pharmacokinetic measurements and safety assessments indicated that the geometric mean of the area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurement in mildly, moderately, and severely renally impaired subjects was 1.30- (90% CI 1.05-1.60), 1.62- (90% CI 1.28-2.06), and 1.60- (90% CI 1.28-2.01) fold higher, respectively, than the healthy controls. The geometric mean of the maximum observed concentration was 1.41- (90% CI 1.05-1.88), 2.02- (90% CI 1.47-2.79), and 1.65- (90% CI: 1.21-2.24) fold higher, respectively. Significant correlations were observed among the creatinine clearance, oral clearance, and maximum concentration of udenafil (P < .01). All adverse events were mild, and no subject discontinued the study. Udenafil administration was well tolerated in all groups. In view of the clinical relevance of drug exposure, our findings indicate that a dose adjustment of udenafil is warranted in subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of DA-8031, a novel selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor for premature ejaculation in healthy male subjects.

OBJECTIVE: DA-8031 is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor under development for the treatment of premature ejaculation. This is the first-in-human study aimed at evaluating the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of DA-8031 and its metabolites (M1, M2, M4, and M5) in the plasma and urine after administration of a single oral dose in healthy male subjects. METHODS: A dose block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study was conducted. Subjects received either placebo or a single dose of DA-8031 at 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, or 120 mg. DA-8031 and its four metabolites were analyzed in the plasma and urine for pharmacokinetic evaluation. The effect of genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome-P450 (CYP) enzymes on the pharmacokinetics of DA-8031 was evaluated. RESULTS: After a single dose, plasma DA-8031 reached the maximum concentration at a median of 2-3 h and was eliminated with terminal elimination half-life of 17.9-28.7 h. The mean renal clearance was 3.7-5.6 L/h. Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics was observed over the dose range of 20-80 mg. Among the metabolites, M4 had the greatest plasma concentration, followed by M5 and M1. Subjects with CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer had significantly greater dose-normalized Cmax and AUC0-t of DA-8031 as well as smaller metabolic ratios than those subjects with CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer. The most common adverse events were nausea, dizziness, and headache, and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the systemic exposure of DA-8031 was increased proportionally to the dose within 20-80 mg. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 had an effect on the systemic exposure of DA-8031. DA-8031 was well tolerated after single doses of 80 mg or less.

Effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, evogliptin (DA-1229).

Evogliptin is a novel potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of evogliptin in participants with renal impairment (RI). An open-label, parallel-group clinical study was conducted in participants with mild, moderate and severe RI and in matched participants with normal renal function (NRF). A single oral 5-mg dose of evogliptin was administered and serial blood and urine samples were obtained to assess the PK and PD characteristics of evogliptin. Baseline urine samples were collected to evaluate endogenous CYP3A metabolic markers. The plasma exposure to evogliptin and degree of DPP-4 activity inhibition increased with decreasing renal function. The mean areas under the concentration-time curves from 0 to 120 hours were increased 1.2-, 1.8- and 1.98-fold in the mild, moderate and severe RI groups, respectively, compared with the NRF group. The levels of CYP3A metabolic markers were lower in the RI group than in the NRF group. The increase in the plasma concentration of evogliptin is unlikely to result in changes in its efficacy or safety, considering the results of previous clinical studies.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis to recommend the optimal dose of udenafil in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of udenafil and its active metabolite, DA-8164, in healthy subjects and patients with hepatic impairment (HI) and to estimate the optimal dosing recommendations for patients with HI. METHODS: An open label, three parallel group, age and weight matched control study was conducted in 18 volunteers, six healthy subjects (n = 6) and patients with mild (Child-Pugh class A, n = 6) and moderate HI (Child-Pugh class B, n = 6). Serial blood samples were collected for up to 72 h after a single administration of udenafil 100 mg. A population PK model was developed using non-linear mixed effects modelling (nonmem, ver. 7.2). The simulated data from the final PK model and original data of healthy subjects were compared to identify the optimal dose for patients with HI. RESULTS: A two compartment model for both udenafil and DA-8164 best described the data. Prothrombin time on metabolic clearance of udenafil to DA-8164 was included in the final model as a covariate. Compared with the AUC(0,tlast ) value after administration of udenafil 100 mg to healthy subjects, the geometric mean ratios (95% confidence interval) after 100 mg and 75 mg udenafil administration were 1.21 (1.10, 1.32) and 0.74 (0.67, 0.81) in patients with mild HI, respectively. Meanwhile, those were 1.55 (1.43, 1.67) and 1.02 (0.92, 1.12) in patients with moderate HI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the recommended doses of udenafil are 100 mg and 75 mg in patients with mild and moderate HI, respectively.

The Effect of Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Udenafil in Healthy Subjects.

Udenafil, a cyclic guanosine monophosphate-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, has been developed to treat erectile dysfunction. We evaluated the effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of udenafil. A single-center, open-label, parallel-group phase 1 study was conducted in healthy adult subjects who took a single oral dose of udenafil (100 mg). The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of udenafil were compared between 12 healthy young men (21-27 years) and 12 healthy elderly men (65-78 years). Serial blood and urine samples were collected for up to 60 and 48 hours after dosing. The plasma concentrations of udenafil and its major metabolite, DA-8164, were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The mean Cmax of udenafil tended to be slightly less (214.0 vs 292.8 µg/L) in the elderly compared with the young (GMR, 68.9; 95% CI, 48.9-97.1); however, the AUC did not differ between the groups (1858.8 vs 2100.6 µg·h/L; GMR, 84.6; 95% CI, 66.1-108.4). The mean t1/2 was prolonged by approximately 5 hours in the elderly (P < .05). The clearance and metabolic AUC ratio did not differ between the elderly and young. In terms of tolerability, all adverse events were mild, and all subjects recovered without additional therapy. The systemic exposure of elderly subjects to udenafil appears to be comparable to or slightly less than that of young healthy subjects. Based on our pharmacokinetic comparisons, udenafil dose adjustment is unlikely to be required in the elderly population.

Bioequivalence evaluation of two amlodipine salts, besylate and orotate, each in a fixed-dose combination with olmesartan in healthy subjects.

A fixed-dose combination of amlodipine and olmesartan is used to treat high blood pressure in patients whose hypertension is not sufficiently controlled with either drug alone. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two fixed-dose combinations, ie, amlodipine orotate/olmesartan medoxomil 10/40 mg and amlodipine besylate/olmesartan medoxomil 10/40 mg, in healthy subjects. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period, crossover study was conducted in 30 healthy adult volunteers. Blood samples were collected for up to 72 hours post-dose in each period. Safety data included the results of physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, an electrocardiogram, and adverse events. For both amlodipine and olmesartan, the 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of AUClast and time to peak plasma concentration fell within the bioequivalence acceptance criteria. The two fixed-dose combinations showed similar safety profiles. Amlodipine orotate/olmesartan medoxomil 10/40 mg was bioequivalent to amlodipine besylate/olmesartan medoxomil 10/40 mg.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between udenafil and dapoxetine: a randomized, open-labeled crossover study in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: "Udenafil" is a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor indicated for erectile dysfunction. "Dapoxetine" is a serotonin transport inhibitor indicated for premature ejaculation. The aim of the study reported here was to investigate the pharmacokinetic drug interaction between udenafil and dapoxetine in healthy male subjects. METHODS: An open-label, three-treatment, six-sequence, three-period crossover study was performed in healthy male subjects. In varying sequences, each subjects received single oral doses of udenafil 200 mg, dapoxetine 60 mg, and both treatments. The periods were separated by a washout period of 7 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 hours after dosing. The plasma concentrations of udenafil and dapoxetine were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by non-compartmental analysis. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Twenty-three healthy subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable time point and measured peak plasma concentration for udenafil were 0.923 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.863-0.987) and 0.864 (90% CI: 0.789-0.947), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable time point and measured peak plasma concentration for dapoxetine were 1.125 (90% CI: 1.044-1.213) and 0.837 (90% CI: 0.758-0.925), respectively. There were no serious adverse events reported, and none of the subjects dropped out due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Udenafil was found to have no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with dapoxetine. The concurrent administration of udenafil and dapoxetine was generally well tolerated.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of evogliptin (DA-1229), a novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor, in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: Evogliptin (DA-1229) is a novel, potent, and selective dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and tolerability of evogliptin after repeated oral administration in healthy subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, dose-escalation study was performed in a total of 30 subjects. Repeated once-daily doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg evogliptin or the same doses of placebo were orally administered to ten subjects in each dosage group for 10 days. Subjects in each group were randomized to receive evogliptin or placebo with a ratio of 8:2. Pharmacokinetics of evogliptin were evaluated, with its concentrations in serial plasma and urine samples collected following the first and last administrations. DPP-IV activity and glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose, and insulin levels were quantified to evaluate evogliptin's pharmacodynamics on the first and last dosing days. RESULTS: All participants completed the study without any serious or severe adverse event. The evogliptin plasma concentration reached its peak within 4-5 hours and decreased relatively slowly, with a terminal elimination half-life of 33-39 hours. Repeated administration resulted in a 1.4- to 1.5-fold accumulation. Evogliptin's systemic exposure and inhibition of plasma DPP-IV activity increased in a dose-dependent manner. Inhibition of DPP-IV activity >80% was sustained over 24 hours in all evogliptin dose groups and provided an increase in postprandial active glucagon-like peptide-1 levels by 1.5- to 2.4-fold. Postprandial glucose levels in the evogliptin-treated groups were reduced 20%-35% compared to placebo, but were not accompanied by increased insulin levels. CONCLUSION: Repeated administration of evogliptin in healthy subjects was well tolerated and exhibited linear pharmacokinetics within the 5-20 mg dose range. A once-daily regimen of 5-20 mg evogliptin effectively inhibited DPP-IV activity.

Pharmacokinetic comparison of 2 fixed-dose combination tablets of amlodipine and valsartan in healthy male Korean volunteers: a randomized, open-label, 2-period, single-dose, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Amlodipine and valsartan have different mechanisms of action, and it is known that the combination therapy with the 2 drugs increases treatment effects compared with the monotherapy with each drug. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) drug is a formulation including fixed amounts of active drug ingredients combined in a single dosage form that is expected to improve medication compliance. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of single administration of a newly developed FDC tablet containing amlodipine orotate 10 mg and valsartan 160 mg (test formulation) with the conventional FDC tablet of amlodipine besylate 10 mg and valsartan 160 mg (reference formulation) in healthy male Korean volunteers. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study. Eligible subjects were between the ages of 20 and 50 years and within 20% of their ideal weight. Each subject received a single dose of the reference and the test formulations, with a 14-day washout period between formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 144 hours after the dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for amlodipine and valsartan. Adverse events were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations. RESULTS: Forty-eight of the 50 enrolled subjects completed the study. For both amlodipine and valsartan, the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were included in the range for assumed bioequivalence, yielding 90% CI ratios of 0.9277 to 0.9903 for AUC(0-last) and 0.9357 to 1.0068 for C(max) in amlodipine, and 0.9784 to 1.1817 for AUC(0-last) and 0.9738 to 1.2145 for C(max) in valsartan. Dizziness was the most frequently noted adverse event, occurring in 4 subjects with the test formulation, followed by oropharyngeal pain occurring in 1 subject with the test formulation and 3 subjects with the reference formulation. All other adverse events occurred in <3 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics of the newly developed FDC tablet of amlodipine and valsartan did not differ significantly from the conventional FDC tablet in these healthy Korean male subjects. Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01823913.